0
0
0
Jefferson City MFA AgriServices
1009 4th Street Click for MAP

Jefferson City, MO 65101

CLICK - MFA CONNECT

(573) 635-7183
Mo
n-Fri 8am-5pm
Sat 8am - Noon 
 

 
Printable Page US Ag News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
 
 
Colorado Sued at SCOTUS       07/17 13:14

   Nebraska Sues Colorado, Alleges Violations of South Platte River Water 
Compact

   Nebraska sued Colorado in the U.S. Supreme Court, alleging illegal water 
diversions from the South Platte River and obstruction of Nebraska's Perkins 
County Canal project.

Todd Neeley
DTN Environmental Editor

   LINCOLN, Neb. (DTN) -- The state of Colorado is threatening Nebraska's water 
supply from the South Platte River by making illegal water diversions and is 
obstructing Nebraska's efforts to build the Perkins County Canal, the state of 
Nebraska alleges in a lawsuit filed with the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday.

   The Supreme Court has jurisdiction in disputes between states and Nebraska 
said in its complaint the court's intervention is needed to stop Colorado from 
violating the South Platte River Compact that has been in effect since 1923.

   The Perkins County Canal project goes back to a drought in the 1890s when 
desperate western Nebraska farm families started digging out a canal from the 
South Platte River in Colorado with plans to irrigate their crops.

   The canal needed to go about 65 miles, but the project was scrapped in 1895 
after about 16 miles were dug out, according to a historical article on the 
project in the North Platte Telegraph. In 1923, though, Nebraska leaders made 
sure to insert a clause in their water compact with Colorado to keep open the 
option for a canal.

   According to information from Nebraska Attorney General Mike Pilger's 
office, the two states have been negotiating the details of the canal for "many 
years" but Colorado officials have yet to agree on "basic things" including 
location and size of the canal or how much water flows through it.

   "Colorado has refused to meaningfully engage Nebraska, instead consistently 
feigning ignorance, demanding more and different types of information, 
neglecting to apply adequate resources to analyze data sets and water 
availability scenarios, and refusing to articulate positions on issues critical 
to design and operation of the canal beyond those that would most obviously 
delay implementation of the project," Nebraska said in the lawsuit.

   Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser sent a letter to Sedgwick County 
commissioners where the canal needs to begin, allegedly threatening legal 
action if Nebraska proceeds with the canal project, the lawsuit said. The 
letter said Colorado is "prepared to defend its rights under the South Platte 
River Compact."

   Nebraska alleges in the lawsuit that Colorado is "essentially racing to 
develop as much of the water supply in excess of Nebraska's Article IV right as 
possible."

   So, by developing the water resources before Nebraska can finish the canal, 
the lawsuit said Colorado is effectively attempting to claim water that the 
compact reserves for Nebraska.

   "Even the Colorado Supreme Court agreed that Colorado's byzantine water 
scheme makes compliance with the compact virtually impossible," the lawsuit 
said.

   "As early as 2003, the court opined that 'intrastate water administration is 
beyond the simple priority administration provided for in Article IV of the 
compact,' so Colorado needed to do more 'in establishing standards for 
administration within Colorado.' That's far afield from the simple compliance 
scheme the states agreed to in Article VIII of the compact."

   Nebraska said in the lawsuit that for the first time in 50 years, at least 
one irrigation district in the state was forced to shut down most of its 
surface water irrigation because of lack of supply.

   "Absent intervention, these harms will only get worse," the lawsuit said.

   "Colorado has built itself a house of cards and it is now doing everything 
in its power to keep it erect, including opposing Nebraska's efforts to build 
the canal."

   In 2022, the lawsuit said, there were more than 100 days when flow at the 
Nebraska/Colorado border fell below the required 120 cubic feet per second.

   Nebraska allocated about $600 million to build the canal in Perkins County 
to secure non-irrigation season water rights. The lawsuit claims Colorado's 
developments will lead to a 90% reduction in river flows during the 
non-irrigation season.

   Colorado's population in the South Platte River and Denver metro basin is 
projected to grow from about 3.8 million in 2015 to 6 million by 2050, the 
lawsuit said, which would create a water supply shortfall of more than 
400,000-acre feet for agriculture uses.

   "Today's action comes only after we made every reasonable effort to resolve 
our differences with Colorado," Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen said.

   "Ultimately, Nebraska must push forward to secure our water for future 
generations. Although we hoped to avoid a lawsuit, we are confident we remain 
on schedule to complete the Perkins County Canal by 2032."

   Read more on DTN:

   "Nebraska Digs Out Canal Plan in Compact," 
https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/article/2022/02/04/fearing-colorad
o-water-projects-old

   Todd Neeley can be reached at todd.neeley@dtn.com

   Follow him on social platform X @DTNeeley




(c) Copyright 2025 DTN, LLC. All rights reserved.

No other Daily email offers as much useful Ag information as DTN Snapshot – Sign up Free today!
 
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN